Star Wars Q&A - Hosted by Jetzt and Bac

[Brandon Rhea]

Yes, I did answer her question if you look up a few posts. But, the last one "editing error" was in response to you.

[The Madet Legacy]

Oh, I thought that was Toxis who replied!

[Brandon Rhea]

[Darth Marv]

jon said:

I posted this in a new thread before I realized it should be in here:

Did any of the following Jedi have known Padawans from the beginning of Episode I to the time of their death?

Even Piell (died in the Jedi Temple via Vader)
Oppo Rancisis (died before ROTS)
Shaak Ti (died in Jedi Temple)
Stass Allie (Temple...)
Eeth Koth (Geonosis)

I've looked and looked, it looks like none of them did. I also know that Tiin did not, but that was because of how independent he was.

Thanks,
Jon


Jetzt: The only one we know about is Eeth Koth's apprentice, Sharad Hett.

Shakk Tii died on grevious's ship

[Brandon Rhea]

darthmarv10 said:

jon said:

I posted this in a new thread before I realized it should be in here:

Did any of the following Jedi have known Padawans from the beginning of Episode I to the time of their death?

Even Piell (died in the Jedi Temple via Vader)
Oppo Rancisis (died before ROTS)
Shaak Ti (died in Jedi Temple)
Stass Allie (Temple...)
Eeth Koth (Geonosis)

I've looked and looked, it looks like none of them did. I also know that Tiin did not, but that was because of how independent he was.

Thanks,
Jon


Jetzt: The only one we know about is Eeth Koth's apprentice, Sharad Hett.

Shakk Tii died on grevious's ship

No she did not. The deleted scene on the DVD is the NON-CANON version of her death. You can see her later on in the Jedi Council scenes. She died in the Jedi Temple.

[Darth Marv]

o ic ic

[Jedi Knight Slade Shadowhawk]

Yeah yeah, I guess...I kind of like the deleted scene death better though. i.e. we actually see it!

[Brandon Rhea]

Still, it's not the canon one. Not everything has to be shown on screen

[Jedi Knight Slade Shadowhawk]

Of course...but it's more heroic instead of vaguely seeing someone that might possibly look like her take it in the back from a clone, you know? (I don't know, if you pause during the massacre at the temple, is she there?)

[Brandon Rhea]

No, she was meditating in her chambers when Darth Vader stabbed her in the back and killed her. They took that out because it disrupted the pacing, as did the original death.

[Master Bondora]

"During additional photography of Episode III in Shepperton Studios, a scene of Anakin Skywalker killing Shaak Ti was photographed for the sequence of events taking place in the besieged Jedi Temple. This version of events was the basis for how the attack on the Jedi played out in the novelization, which has Shaak Ti in charge of defending the Temple. This scene, too, was cut from the movie.

Although her earlier death at Grievous' hands was completed and included on the DVD as a deleted scene, it should not be considered the canon version of her fate. This is because she is still visible later on in the movie as part of the Kashyyyk hologram. The deleted scene on the DVD, "General Grievous Slaughters a Jedi," should instead be considered an interesting look at what might have been."

Starwars.com

[Brandon Rhea]

Thanks for combining two of my posts into one and adding more depth to it

[Master Bondora]

jedimasterbac said:

Thanks for combining two of my posts into one and adding more depth to it

No problem

[Jedi Knight Slade Shadowhawk]

Hehe. Yeah, showing Vader taking the time to kill Shaak would slow the pacing of that particular scene. Now maybe if they would have shown more lightsaber action, eh?

[Brandon Rhea]

That scene didn't need more lightsaber action. People had it in their minds, therefor making assumptions, that there would be a lot of the Jedi Purge in Revenge of the Sith. It doesn't need to be there. We get the idea that it happens, and it showed Anakin's story. We got Order 66, but we didn't need to see a lot of action in the Temple. It was not necessary for the overall story.